Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Just the Facts, Ma’Am (by Jill Lepore, the New Yorker)



Note to the Illustration:
Modern history arose when the novel did, but novelists had their truths to claim.
illustration by Barry Blitt.

A Critic at Large
Just the Facts, Ma’Am
Fake memoirs, factual fictions, and the history of history.
by Jill Lepore March 24, 2008

What makes a book a history? In the eighteenth century, novelists called their books “histories,” smack on the title page. No one was more brash about this than Henry Fielding, who, in his 1749 “History of Tom Jones, a Foundling,” included a chapter called “Of Those Who Lawfully May, and of Those Who May Not Write Such Histories as This.” Fielding insisted that what flowed from his pen was “true history”; fiction was what historians wrote.

“I shall not look on myself as accountable to any Court of Critical Jurisdiction whatever: For as I am, in reality, the Founder of a new Province of Writing,” Fielding explained. Tom Jones’s claim to truth is different from Margaret Jones’s. Earlier this month, Jones, also known as Margaret Seltzer, tried to pass off a gangland bildungsroman as the story of her life. Pulped days after it was published, the book, titled “Love and Consequences,” is a fraud; “Tom Jones” is not. Fielding was playing; Seltzer was just lying.



But Fielding meant it when he said that “Tom Jones” was true, and there’s a sense in which he was right. History matters, but the best novels boast a kind of truth that even the best history books can never claim. And when history books are wrong they can be miserably, badly, ridiculously wrong, a point that wasn’t lost on Jane Austen, who, in 1791, when she was sixteen, wrote a brilliant parody of Oliver Goldsmith’s four-volume, march-of-the-monarchs “History of England, from the Earliest Times to the Death of George II.” (Goldsmith, the author of the novel “The Vicar of Wakefield,” wrote history to keep out of debtors’ prison.) Austen called her parody “The History of England from the Reign of Henry the 4th to the Death of Charles the 1st, by a Partial, Prejudiced & Ignorant Historian.” It consisted of thirteen perfectly dunderheaded character sketches of crowned heads of England. Of Henry V, she wrote, “During his reign, Lord Cobham was burnt alive, but I forget what for.” Of the Duke of Somerset: “He was beheaded, of which he might with reason have been proud, had he known that such was the death of Mary Queen of Scotland; but as it was impossible that he should be conscious of what had never happened, it does not appear that he felt particularly delighted with the manner of it.” Of the allegation that Lady Jane Grey, Edward VI’s cousin, read Greek: “Whether she really understood that language or whether such a study proceeded only from an excess of vanity for which I believe she was always rather remarkable, is uncertain.” Once in a great while, Austen happened to bump into a fact or two, for which she apologized: “Truth being I think very excusable in an Historian.”



Historians and novelists are kin, in other words, but they’re more like brothers who throw food at each other than like sisters who borrow each other’s clothes. The literary genre that became known as “the novel” was born in the eighteenth century. History, the empirical sort based on archival research and practiced in universities, anyway, was born at much the same time. Its novelty is not as often remembered, though, not least because it wasn’t called “novel.” In a way, history is the anti-novel, the novel’s twin, though which is Cain and which is Abel depends on your point of view.


Among the ancients, history was a literary art, as John Burrow illustrates in his fascinating compendium “A History of Histories: Epics, Chronicles, Romances and Inquiries from Herodotus and Thucydides to the Twentieth Century” (Knopf; $35). Invention was a hallmark of ancient history, which was filled with long, often purely fictitious speeches of great men. It was animated by rhetoric, not by evidence. Even well into the eighteenth century, not a few historians continued to understand themselves as artists, with license to invent. Eager not to be confused with antiquarians and mere chroniclers, even budding empiricists confessed a certain lack of fussiness about facts. In “Letters on the Study and Use of History” (1752), Henry St. John, Viscount Bolingbroke condemned those who “store their minds with crude unruminated facts and sentences; and hope to supply, by bare memory, the want of imagination and judgment.”



The transformation of history into an empirical science began as early as the sixteenth century and became entrenched only in the nineteenth century. By the time the American Historical Association was founded, in 1884, the “cult of the fact” (as the intellectual historian Peter Novick has called it) had achieved ascendancy. Ever since, generations of historians have defined themselves by a set of standards that rest on the distinction between truth and invention, even when that has meant scorning everyone who came before them. Between 1834 and 1874, the American statesman and historian George Bancroft, much influenced by Sir Walter Scott, produced a ten-volume “History of the United States.” It is romantic and opinionated; it has a gritty voice and a passionate point of view. It’s a little . . . novel-ish. In the eighteen-seventies, one Young Turk suggested that a better title for it would be “The Psychological Autobiography of George Bancroft, As Illustrated by Incidents and Characters in the Annals of the United States.” A generation later, Bancroft’s monumental accomplishment looked even worse: now it was, as the Yale historian Charles McLean Andrews put it, “nothing less than a crime against historical truth.”

But is “historical truth” truer than fictional truth? The difference between history and poetry, Aristotle argued, is that “the one tells what has happened, the other the kind of things that can happen. And in fact that is why the writing of poetry is a more philosophical activity, and one to be taken more seriously, than the writing of history.” Historians have turned this thinking on its head. History, not literature, is the serious stuff.



In the nineteen-eighties and nineties, many historians worried that the seriousness of history, its very integrity as a discipline, was in danger of being destroyed by literary theorists who insisted on the constructedness, the fictionality, of all historical writing—who suggested that the past is nothing more than a story we tell about it. The field seemed to be tottering on the edge of an epistemological abyss: If history is fiction, if history is not true, what’s the use? (The panic has since died down, but it hasn’t died out. Donald Kagan, in his 2005 Jefferson lecture, “In Defense of History,” grumbled about the perils of “pseudo-philosophical mumbo-jumbo.”) In 1990, Sir Geoffrey Elton called postmodern literary theory “the intellectual equivalent of crack.” The next year, the eminent American historian Gordon Wood, writing in The New York Review of Books, warned that if things were to keep on this way historians would soon “put themselves out of business.” Reviewing Simon Schama’s “Dead Certainties (Unwarranted Speculations)”—a history book in which Schama indulged in flights of fancy, fully disclosed as such—Wood wrote, “His violation of the conventions of history writing actually puts the integrity of the discipline of history at risk.” That review, along with twenty more (including one of a book of mine), appears in Wood’s new book, “The Purpose of the Past: Reflections on the Uses of History” (Penguin Press; $25.95); each review has an afterword, and in an introduction the author catalogues the failings of “unhistorical historians.”



Revisiting his review of “Dead Certainties,” Wood takes the trouble to reproach Schama again for having “forgotten that he was not Walter Scott or E. L. Doctorow,” and for ignoring “both the epistemological climate of the early 1990s and the devastating effects such a work by such a distinguished historian could have on the conventions of the discipline.” As Wood sees it, these conventions need protecting because their novelty—“They are scarcely more than a century old”—makes them fragile. But they’re sturdier than he thinks. Margaret Jones is accountable to a court of jurisdiction in a way that Tom Jones was not. Historians and critics, readers and writers, haven’t given up on truth. And postmodernism turns out to be a bit of a bugbear. It’s premodernism that’s got all the teeth.



In the eighteenth century, the boundary between history and fiction was different from what it is now. For one thing, plenty of people wrote both history books and novels, including Voltaire, Fielding, Tobias Smollett, Oliver Goldsmith, Daniel Defoe, William Godwin, Mary Wollstonecraft, and Charles Brockden Brown. The century’s most influential historians, David Hume and Edward Gibbon, happen to have been particular fans of Fielding’s novels (and Fielding considered reading history essential preparation for writing novels). History books and novels alike aimed at seducing readers through plot and even suspense. “History, like tragedy, requires an exposition, a central action, and a dénouement,” Voltaire wrote in 1752. “My secret is to force the reader to wonder: Will Philip V ascend the throne?”

Eighteenth-century novels also pretended that they were true. Not only did they call themselves “histories”; they also often took the form of counterfeit historical documents, usually letters or journals—a form that was itself a parody of the conventions of historical writing. In the preface to “The Life and Strange Surprizing Adventures of Robinson Crusoe” (1719), Daniel Defoe insisted, “The Editor believes the thing to be a just History of Fact; neither is there any Appearance of Fiction in it.” But of course Defoe was not the editor of a journal kept by a man named Crusoe; there was no journal. Defoe made it up. What Defoe meant by this imposture, one critic wrote, “I know not; unless you would have us think, that the Manner of your telling a Lie will make it a Truth.”



It’s easy to think that Defoe was joking, as if Robinson Crusoe’s journal were as much a gimmick as Esquire’s “diary” of Heath Ledger, but Defoe, like Fielding, was making a (mostly) straight-faced epistemological argument. And less playful novelists did the same thing. Samuel Richardson insisted that he was merely the editor of Pamela’s letters, first published in England in 1740 as “Pamela; or, Virtue Rewarded” (and published by Benjamin Franklin in Philadelphia two years later). This was a lie, but not a hoax; Richardson wanted his novels to be read with “Historical Faith,” since they contained, he believed, the truth of the possible, the truth of human nature. The first American novels weren’t published until the seventeen-eighties and nineties, but they cluttered their title pages with the same claims: “FOUNDED ON FACT”; “A Tale of Truth.”



What this implies is nicely illustrated by David Hume (who, in his lifetime, was better known as a historian than as a philosopher). In “Of the Study of History” (1741), Hume told a story about how the same book can be read as both history and fiction. A “young beauty” asked Hume to send her some novels; instead, he sent her some history books—Plutarch’s Lives—but told her they were novels, assuring her “that there was not a word of truth in them from beginning to end.” She read them avidly, at least “ ’till she came to the lives of ALEXANDER and CAESAR, whose names she had heard of by accident; and then returned me the book, with many reproaches for deceiving her.” As fiction, Plutarch’s Lives was delightful; as history, it was unbearable. Hume toyed with the opposite idea in “A Treatise of Human Nature” (1739-40): two books, one a history, and one a novel, might contain the same truth. “If one person sits down to read a book as a romance, and another as a true history,” he wrote, “they plainly receive the same ideas, and in the same order; nor does the incredulity of the one, and the belief of the other hinder them from putting the very same sense upon their author. His words produce the same ideas in both.”



If a history book can be read as if it were a novel, and if a reader can find the same truth in a history book and a novel, what, finally, is the difference between them? This is a difficult question, Hume admitted. Maybe it just feels different—more profound—to read what we believe to be true (an idea assented to) than what we believe to be false (a fancy): “An idea assented to feels different from a fictitious idea, that the fancy alone presents to us.”


But there’s more between them. A novel, as Defoe put it, is a “private History,” a history of private life. “I will tell you in three words what the book is,” Laurence Sterne wrote in “The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy,” published beginning in 1759. He was talking about Locke’s account of how the mind worked and, by extension, his own. “It is a history.—A history! of who? what? where? when? Don’t hurry yourself. —It is a history-book, Sir, (which may possibly recommend it to the world) of what passes in a man’s own mind.” Fielding went farther. He called his writing “true history.” It is “our Business to relate Facts as they are,” Fielding told his reader, classing himself among historical writers who draw their materials not from records but from “the vast authentic Doomsday-Book of Nature.”



For Fielding, there are two kinds of historical writing: history based in fact (whose truth is founded in documentary evidence), and history based in fiction (whose truth is founded in human nature). Maybe—to take some license with Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice” (1813)—these two manners of writing bear the same relationship to one another as Mr. Darcy and Mr. Wickham: “One has got all the truth, and the other all the appearance of it.” The question is: which is which?


“Dismiss me from the falsehood and impossibility of history, and deliver me over to the reality of romance,” the English writer William Godwin pleaded in “Of History and Romance,” in 1797. (Not for nothing had Godwin called his novel, written a few years earlier, “Things As They Are.”) There is not and never can be any such thing as true history, Godwin insisted: “Nothing is more uncertain, more contradictory, more unsatisfactory than the evidence of facts.” Every history is incomplete; every historian has a point of view; every historian relies on what is unreliable—documents written by people who were not under oath and cannot be cross-examined. (That is to say, even the best historian has a good deal in common with Jane Austen’s “Partial, Prejudiced & Ignorant Historian.”) Before his imperfect sources, the historian is powerless: “He must take what they choose to tell, the broken fragments, and the scattered ruins of evidence.” He could decide merely to reproduce his sources, to offer a list of facts: “But this is in reality no history. He that knows only on what day the Bastille was taken and on what spot Louis XVI perished, knows nothing.”

Fortunately, there is yet another kind of history, Godwin argued, “the noblest and most excellent species of history”: the novel, or romance. The novelist is the better historian—and especially better than the empirical historian—because he admits that he is partial, prejudiced, and ignorant, and because he has not forsaken passion: “The writer of romance is to be considered as the writer of real history; while he who was formerly called the historian, must be contented to step down into the place of his rival, with this disadvantage, that he is a romance writer, without the arduous, the enthusiastic and the sublime licence of imagination that belong to that species of composition.”



Godwin’s essay wasn’t published until the twentieth century, which makes it all the more remarkable that the Philadelphian Charles Brockden Brown put forth a look-alike argument in “The Difference Between History and Romance,” an essay published in The Monthly Magazine and American Review in April, 1800. (To be sure, Brown was very much influenced by Godwin. Carl Van Doren once wrote, “His novels all bear the marks of haste, immaturity, and Godwin.”) “History and romance are terms that have never been very clearly distinguished from each other,” Brown began. “It should seem that one dealt in fiction, and the other in truth; that one is a picture of the probable and certain, and the other a tissue of untruths; that one describes what might have happened, and what has actually happened, and the other what never had existence.” Yet these distinctions are not as helpful as they at first appear: history concerns facts, but, because these have to be arranged and explained, the historian “is a dealer, not in certainties, but probabilities, and is therefore a romancer.”



In an 1806 essay called “Historical Characters Are False Representations of Nature,” Brown suggested that the historian’s grossest deception is promoting the idea that only the great are good: “Popular prejudice assists the illusion, and because we are accustomed to behold public characters occupy a situation in life that few can experience, we are induced to believe that their capacities are more enlarged, their passions more refined, and, in a word, that nature has bestowed on them faculties denied to obscurer men.” But great characters are not superior to obscure men, who are, alas, condemned to obscurity by history itself. “If it were possible to read the histories of those who are doomed to have no historian, and to glance into domestic journals as well as into national archives,” Brown speculated, “we should then perceive the unjust prodigality of our sympathy to those few names, which eloquence has adorned with all the seduction of her graces.”



Fiction, in other words, can do what history doesn’t but should: it can tell the story of ordinary people. The eighteenth century’s fictive history (not to be confused with what we call “historical fiction”) is the history of private life; the history of what passes in a man’s own mind; true to the Book of Nature; and written in plain, simple style, exhibiting both judgment and invention. And it is the history of obscure men. Who are these obscure men? Well, a lot of them are women.


For every Tom Jones and Robinson Crusoe, there were a dozen Clarissas, Pamelas, and Charlotte Temples. If eighteenth-century novels are history, they’re women’s history. And they were adored, above all, by women readers. “Novel Reading, a Cause of Female Depravity” was the revealing title of an essay published in England in 1797 and in Boston five years later. Everyone from preachers to politicians damned novels as corrupting of both public and private virtue and, above all, of women’s virtue. “Novels not only pollute the imaginations of young women,” one American magazine writer insisted in 1798; they give them “false ideas of life.”

What, pray, was the remedy for this grave social ill? Reading history. “There is nothing which I would recommend more earnestly to my female readers than the study of history,” Hume wrote in “Of the Study of History” (which is why he gave his lady friend Plutarch’s Lives, and told her it was a novel). But, on the whole, women were not particularly interested in reading history. Hume attributed this to the fair sex’s “aversion to matter of fact” and its “appetite for falsehood.” Men “allow us Poetry, Plays, and Romances,” Mary Astell wrote in 1705, “and when they would express a particular Esteem for a Woman’s Sense, they recommend History.” But why read it? “For tho’ it may be of Use to Men who govern Affairs, to know how their Fore-fathers Acted, yet what is this to us?” Much as writers of history tried to woo women readers, they made very little headway. Near the end of the century, Mary Wollstonecraft was left to ask of women: “Is it surprising that they find the reading of history a very dry task?” (After publishing her “Vindication of the Rights of Women,” in 1792, Wollstonecraft started writing a novel, “Maria; or, the Wrongs of Women,” to make sure that her arguments would reach women readers. Her husband, William Godwin, had it published in 1798, after she died, in childbirth.)



Women were not only not interested in history; they didn’t trust it. In “Northanger Abbey” (completed by 1803), Jane Austen’s comic heroine, who adores novels, confesses that she finds history both boring and impossible to credit: “It tells me nothing that does not either vex or weary me. The quarrels of popes and kings, with wars or pestilences, in every page; the men all so good for nothing, and hardly any women at all—it is very tiresome: and yet I often think it odd that it should be so dull, for a great deal of it must be invention.” Austen saw fit to echo this exchange in “Persuasion” (1818). “All histories are against you,” Captain Harville insists, when Austen’s levelheaded heroine, Anne Elliot, argues that women are more constant than men. “But perhaps you will say, these were all written by men,” Harville guesses, and Anne agrees. “Men have had every advantage of us in telling their own story,” she observes, saying, “I will not allow books to prove any thing.”



By the end of the eighteenth century, not just novel readers but most novel writers were women, too. And most historians, along with their readers, were men. As the discipline of history, the anti-novel, emerged, and especially as it professionalized, it defined itself as the domain of men. (Women might write biography, or dabble in genealogy.) Eighteenth-century observers, in other words, understood the distinction between history and fiction not merely and maybe not even predominantly as a distinction between truth and invention but as a distinction between stories by, about, and of interest to men and stories by, about, and of interest to women. Women read novels, women wrote novels, women were the heroines of novels. Men read history, men wrote history, men were the heroes of history. (When men wrote novels, Godwin suggested, this was regarded as “a symptom of effeminacy.”)


As Burrow’s “A History of Histories” and Wood’s “Purpose of the Past” make clear, however, much of what distinguished eighteenth-century fiction from eighteenth-century history is now part of how academic historians write history. Most of the popular history books you’ll find in Barnes & Noble celebrate the public lives of famous men, but the history books that many academics have been writing for the past half century concern the private lives of ordinary people. (Memoirs constitute a related but distinct genre, chronicling the lives of both the famous and the not so famous, and borrowing from the conventions of history and of fiction. Fake memoirs, like Margaret Jones’s or Misha Defonesca’s, borrow from those genres, but without achieving the legitimacy of either.) “By the 1970s,” Wood writes, “this new social history of hitherto forgotten people had come to dominate academic history writing.” Maybe the topics that have seized professional historians’ attention—family history, social history, women’s history, cultural history, “microhistory”—constitute nothing more than an attempt to take back territory they forfeited to novelists in the eighteenth century. If so, historians have reclaimed from novelists nearly everything except the license to invent . . . and women readers. Today, publishers figure that men buy the great majority of popular history books; most fiction buyers are women.



Is “history at risk”? If women barely read it at all, and if men mostly read books with titles like “Guts and Guns,” it just might be. “A History of Histories” and “The Purpose of the Past” offer a useful reminder that history is a long and endlessly interesting argument, where evidence is everything and storytelling is everything else. But, as for telling stories, maybe historians still have a few things to learn from novelists. Reading Jane Austen being I think very excusable in an Historian.

287 comments:

1 – 200 of 287   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

I found this site using [url=http://google.com]google.com[/url] And i want to thank you for your work. You have done really very good site. Great work, great site! Thank you!

Sorry for offtopic

Anonymous said...

Who knows where to download XRumer 5.0 Palladium?
Help, please. All recommend this program to effectively advertise on the Internet, this is the best program!

Anonymous said...

[url=http://forums.alphaplus.ca/]Cialis Overnight Delivery[/url]

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol no rx tramadol withdrawal exhaustion - tramadol interactions

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol no prescription tramadol 50mg better than vicodin - online pharmacy usa tramadol

Anonymous said...

discount ativan ativan urine test - overnight ativan order

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol 180 tramadol hydrochloride 100 mg - tramadol and alcohol

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol rx generic tramadol no prescription cod - tramadol hcl 50 mg generic

Anonymous said...

order ativan cost of lorazepam 1mg - ativan normal dosage

Anonymous said...

buy generic tramadol online tramadol ultram wiki - cheap tramadol line

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol overnight delivery tramadol hcl veterinary use - tramadol hcl 225 mg

Anonymous said...

klonopin mg does generic klonopin look like - klonopin for alcohol withdrawal dosage

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol uk tramadol 50 mg premature ejaculation - tramadol hcl acetaminophen par

Anonymous said...

buy cheap ativan ativan dosage and side effects - long do ativan withdrawal last

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol cash on delivery tramadol no prescription buy - tramadol purchase cheap

Anonymous said...

klonopin depression klonopin side effects itching - klonopin dosage strengths

Anonymous said...

cheap ativan online buy ativan australia - ativan overdose amount mg

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol online order tramadol online uk - best place buy tramadol online reviews

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol tramadol renal dosing - tramadol no prescription overnight shipping

Anonymous said...

ativan no prescription ativan side effects - ativan withdrawal length

Anonymous said...

ativan for sale ativan under the tongue - much does generic ativan cost

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol 100mg online tramadol withdrawal suboxone - buy tramadol online no prescription overnight

Anonymous said...

soma pharmacy generic somatropin - buy soma seeds

Anonymous said...

ativan for anxiety ativan klonopin together - buy lorazepam sublinguale

Anonymous said...

cheapest ambien ambien 20 mg dose - ambien and alcohol abuse

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol buy tramadol usa online - can you buy tramadol over the counter in usa

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol order tramadol online forum - tramadol 50mg (generic ultram)

Anonymous said...

order zolpidem ambien overdose how much is too much - death from ambien and alcohol

Anonymous said...

tramadol 100mg buy ultram - buy tramadol cod saturday delivery

Anonymous said...

buy clonazepam klonopin withdrawal librium - klonopin zoloft together

Anonymous said...

buy soma online soma 250 muscle relaxer - buy somatropin in australia

Anonymous said...

ativan lorazepam ativan side effects long term - ativan dosage to get high

Anonymous said...

buy ambien online ambien show on drug screen - ambien side effects muscle twitching

Anonymous said...

soma muscle relaxant where to buy soma - generic soma compound

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol online tramadol dosage sr - tramadol hcl side effects in dogs

Anonymous said...

klonopin pharmacy klonopin withdrawal reflux - what is klonopin for anxiety

Anonymous said...

buy ambien online no rx buy ambien prescription online - ambien cr sleeping pill

Anonymous said...

ambien 10mg will overdose ambien do - ambien side effects tremors

Anonymous said...

buy soma online no prescription soma san diego pictures - buy generic soma online

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol online buy generic tramadol no prescription - tramadol online florida delivery

Anonymous said...

generic ambien ambien side effects irritability - ambien price without insurance

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol online no prescription cheap celebrity tramadol addiction - tramadol addiction dosage

Anonymous said...

klonopin pill klonopin withdrawal shaking - klonopin xanax erowid

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol cod tramadol 50mg generic - 350 mg tramadol high

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol online no prescription buy tramadol rx online - tramadol dosage greyhounds

Anonymous said...

tramadol online get prescription online tramadol - best place order tramadol

Anonymous said...

2mg klonopin 2mg klonopin high - 2mg of klonopin and alcohol

Anonymous said...

tramadol online buy tramadol hydrochloride online uk - buy ultram online cheap

Anonymous said...

lorazepam no prescription ativan cream - get through ativan withdrawal

Anonymous said...

buy ambien online ambien generic overdose - stories of ambien side effects

Anonymous said...

order carisoprodol side effects soma pills - discount soma no prescription

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol online buy ultram online with no prescription - tramadol high energy

Anonymous said...

lorazepam 1mg ativan uses and side effects - ativan medicine

Anonymous said...

buy cheap tramadol buy tramadol pay cod - will get high tramadol

Anonymous said...

buy klonopin buy klonopin canada - how to get on klonopin

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol free shipping tramadol to buy online - tramadol hcl liver

Anonymous said...

generic ambien ambien side effects anxiety attacks - ambien side effects skin rash

Anonymous said...

buy generic viagra cheap viagra ebay - buy viagra toronto

Anonymous said...

order ambien online no prescription celebrex ambien drug interactions - buy ambien online australia

Anonymous said...

is it safe to order viagra online viagra from india online - generic viagra shipped canada

Anonymous said...

buy klonopin online klonopin 2mg side effects - klonopin withdrawal bluelight

Anonymous said...

viagra online where to order viagra online in canada - buy viagra hyderabad

Anonymous said...

buy ambien online no rx ambien cr not working - zolpidem tartrate generic ambien

Anonymous said...

generic ambien ambien walrus blog - ambien your system drug test

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol online tramadol quinine - tramadol effexor

Anonymous said...

buy klonopin online klonopin dosage - buy clonazepam india

Anonymous said...

buy ambien online ambien zoloft drug interactions - cost ambien 10mg

Anonymous said...

how to order viagra generic viagra in stores - safe buy viagra online yahoo

Anonymous said...

ambien online without rx ambien side effects sleep walking - ambien india pharmacy

Anonymous said...

buy klonopin online no prescription snort klonopin erowid - klonopin withdrawal nightmares

Anonymous said...

tramadol online buy ultram cheap - tramadol with valium high

Anonymous said...

how to buy viagra online without purchase viagra melbourne - viagra for women online

Anonymous said...

order viagra online without script viagra online london - generic viagra paypal

Anonymous said...

ambien on line ambien 20 mg side effects - ambien pill what does it look like

Anonymous said...

buy viagra online legitimate online pharmacy viagra - can you buy viagra vietnam

Anonymous said...

zolpidem drug ambien to purchase - ambien drug urine test

Anonymous said...

generic klonopin klonopin vs lexapro - half life 2mg klonopin

Anonymous said...

buy viagra buy viagra online with mastercard - generic viagra price

Anonymous said...

zolpidem no prescription ambien cr website - purchase ambien in canada

Anonymous said...

order viagra online cheap buy cheap pfizer viagra online - can order viagra online canada

Anonymous said...

viagra online cheap viagra next day delivery uk - purchase viagra philippines

Anonymous said...

order generic viagra online illegal buy viagra online canada - buy viagra online nz

Anonymous said...

cialis online can you buy cialis in hong kong - cialis user reviews

Anonymous said...

buy viagra online next day delivery viagra for women in mumbai - viagra online risks

Anonymous said...

tramadol online what is tramadol dosage - tramadol 50 mg

Anonymous said...

buy soma soma the muscle relaxer - buy soma online cod

Anonymous said...

viagra online viagra from india - viagra for men buy online india

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol online mastercard overnight tramadol dosage neuropathy - can you buy tramadol in greece

Anonymous said...

buy generic cialis cialis online deutschland - long does daily cialis take work

Anonymous said...

online soma soma online pharmacy no prescription - soma drug novel

Anonymous said...

viagra sildenafil viagra for women - viagra where to buy .au

Anonymous said...

tramadol online tramadol addiction withdrawl - buyers of tramadol

Anonymous said...

buy viagra buy viagra online overnight delivery - best place buy viagra online reviews

Anonymous said...

cialis medication buy real cialis cheap - cialis price viagra

Anonymous said...

purchase viagra legal buy viagra online uk - viagra cialis levitra online pharmacy

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol online where to buy tramadol over the counter - buy tramadol in europe

Anonymous said...

cheap viagra online buy genuine viagra online canada - order generic viagra online canada

Anonymous said...

buy generic cialis online no prescription buy brand cialis no prescription - cialis vs viagra buy online

Anonymous said...

tramadol 100 tramadol hcl generic - tramadol for dogs and humans

Anonymous said...

can you buy cialis over the counter cialis cheap - reviews for online cialis

Anonymous said...

buy viagra online no rx cheap generic viagra usa - buy generic viagra canada

Anonymous said...

buy viagra pills online viagra online australia net - viagra online natural

Anonymous said...

viagra online buy viagra cheap online - purchase viagra from india

Anonymous said...

cialis pills order generic cialis online no prescription - cialis jelly sachet

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol cheap online tramadol hcl 50 mg para que es - tramadol 50 mg opiate

Anonymous said...

buy strattera online strattera yawning - side effects strattera teenage girls

Anonymous said...

buy retin-a retin a micro 2nd week - retin a micro price without insurance

Anonymous said...

cialis online buy cialis online pharmacy - generic cialis effectiveness

Anonymous said...

buy viagra pills viagra 2 chainz - buy viagra rite aid

Anonymous said...

tramadol online tramadol ultram ultracet - buy tramadol forum

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol online buy tramadol cod overnight delivery - tramadol for dogs vs people

Anonymous said...

strattera drug generic to strattera - strattera pictures of pills

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol overnight tramadol addiction help usa - buy tramadol online from usa

Anonymous said...

buy sildenafil cheap viagra alternatives uk - buy viagra world 8080

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol free shipping tramadol hydrochloride 50 mg recreational use - tramadol for dogs arthritis

Anonymous said...

buy retin-a buy retin a gel online no prescription - retin a cream breastfeeding

Anonymous said...

propecia online cheap propecia - propecia side effects impotence

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol cod fedex tramadol 50mg for dogs - tramadol 50 mg recommended dose

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol saturday delivery tramadol withdrawal suboxone - buy tramadol online saturday delivery

Anonymous said...

tramadol online tramadol withdrawal time - tramadol for dogs take with food

Anonymous said...

order cialis online cialis price comparison - buy cialis 10mg online

Anonymous said...

where to buy tramadol tramadol withdrawal protocol - tramadol 50mg usage

Anonymous said...

buy strattera online what is the generic for strattera - weaning off strattera side effects

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol online no prescription cheap tramadol 7.5 - tramadol hcl online

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol tramadol zydol 50mg - tramadol hcl taken with tylenol

Anonymous said...

propecia online where to buy propecia - where can i buy generic propecia in the united states

Anonymous said...

order tramadol no prescription order cheap tramadol online - legal buy tramadol online us

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol online cod buy tramadol rx online - tramadol 50mg better than vicodin

Anonymous said...

buy strattera online buy strattera online - atomoxetine or strattera

Anonymous said...

tramadol online pharmacy order tramadol online - buy tramadol line uk

Anonymous said...

buy retin-a online how to buy retin a cream - buy retin a micro gel no prescription

Anonymous said...

tramadol online pharmacy tramadol withdrawal in newborns - where should i buy tramadol from online

Anonymous said...

generic strattera much does strattera cost - strattera dosing chart for children

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol online with mastercard tramadol cheap - buy tramadol overnight with mastercard

Anonymous said...

propecia without prescription propecia 4 month shed - buy propecia brand

Anonymous said...

tramadol no prescription can you buy tramadol online legally - tramadol hcl max dosage

Anonymous said...

order tramadol online cod buy tramadol online in usa - can take tramadol high blood pressure

Anonymous said...

generic propecia online finasteride mg - propecia generic cost

Anonymous said...

buy strattera online strattera cost comparison - strattera dosage kids

Anonymous said...

generic tramadol online buy tramadol rx online - tramadol from usa no prescription

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol cash on delivery tramadol 50/ 100 mg - tramadol online

Anonymous said...

strattera medication strattera vs generic - strattera wonder drug

Anonymous said...

tramadol 50mg tramadol 50 mg order online - tramadol for dogs how much

Anonymous said...

tramadol online tramadol 50mg side effects - tramadol ultram 50mg

Anonymous said...

buy propecia order propecia online no prescription - generic propecia american express

Anonymous said...

tramadol online overnight tramadol extended release tablets dosage - tramadol online sale

Anonymous said...

tramadol 50 mg buy tramadol online with visa - tramadol withdrawal methadone

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol online tramadol overdose narcan - tramadol gotas

Anonymous said...

tramadol online pharmacy buy tramadol usa - tramadol 50mg does get you high

Anonymous said...

tramadol no prescription can tramadol hcl 50 mg be cut in half - ultram side effects rash

Anonymous said...

tramadol 50 mg is ordering tramadol online illegal - tramadol max dose

Anonymous said...

discount propecia buy propecia yahoo answers - propecia korea

Anonymous said...

tramadol 50 mg buy tramadol hydrochloride online - tramadol 50 mg canine

Anonymous said...

buy retin-a online buy retin a micro gel online - retin-a micro pump purchase

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol without prescriptions symptoms of tramadol overdose - tramadol hcl uses

Anonymous said...

tramadol online overnight tramadol 627 recommended dosage - generic form tramadol

Anonymous said...

cheap viagra cheap viagra nz - buy brand viagra online us

Anonymous said...

tramadol online tramadol dosage osteosarcoma - buy tramadol with paypal

Anonymous said...

cheap tramadol online tramadol addiction while pregnant - tramadol buyers

Anonymous said...

buy viagra cheap buy viagra in us - viagra 30 mg

Anonymous said...

buy cialis buy cialis cheap - cheap cialis in australia

Anonymous said...

generic viagra how to order viagra online in us - order viagra walgreens

Anonymous said...

tramadol 50 mg tramadol generic ultram 50 mg 180 pills - order tramadol online saturday delivery

Anonymous said...

viagra 100mg viagra online site reviews - cheap usn viagra

Anonymous said...

cheap cialis online cialis prices canada - generic cialis with no prescription

Anonymous said...

cialis online pharmacy generic cialis viagra - cialis online legit

Anonymous said...

buy viagra online viagra with food - buy viagra us no prescription

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol tramadol 9 panel drug test - tramadol hcl 75mg

Anonymous said...

purchase cialis cialis online acquisto - generic cialis vs brand cialis

Anonymous said...

cheap viagra cheap viagra us - viagra online generic cheap

Anonymous said...

cialis pills cialisonline.it - cialis no effect

Anonymous said...

tramadol online tramadol no prescription - tramadol hcl migraine

Anonymous said...

viagra online without prescription viagra buy in us - buying viagra online guide

Anonymous said...

viagra sildenafil viagra dosage pulmonary hypertension - viagra trial pack

Anonymous said...

cheap viagra best website buy generic viagra - buy viagra 500mg

Anonymous said...

discount cialis buy cialis online canada pharmacy - cialis going generic

Anonymous said...

order viagra men's health viagra online - how to purchase viagra in us

Anonymous said...

generic viagra buy viagra rite aid - buy viagra online best sites

Anonymous said...

cheap viagra buy viagra online 25mg - reputable online generic viagra

Anonymous said...

sildenafil citrate viagra vs levitra - order cheap viagra online us

Anonymous said...

buy sildenafil where to buy viagra online yahoo answers - generic viagra online us co

Anonymous said...

generic tadalafil cialis online+truffa - cialis online from us pharmacy

Anonymous said...

cheap viagra pink viagra for women us - cheap viagra alternatives us

Anonymous said...

generic cialis buy cialis online europe - generic cialis goedkoop

Anonymous said...

buy cialis cialis online rezept - cialis 0 005

Anonymous said...

buy tadalafil online viagra or cialis online - order viagra cialis online

Anonymous said...

generic cialis cialis kosher for passover - cialis generic best price

Anonymous said...

buy soma online generic soma wiki - soma no prescription overnight

Anonymous said...

buy cialis buy cialis online canada no prescription - can you buy cialis online in canada

Anonymous said...

soma carisoprodol soma 350 mg drug interactions - the muscle relaxer soma

Anonymous said...

buy generic cialis buy cialis online in australia - cheap generic cialis online

Anonymous said...

cheap cialis online cialis купить киев - cialis online prescription

Anonymous said...

cialis 10mg how to buy cialis online in australia - cialis online rx reviews

Anonymous said...

buy cialis cialis online germany - where to order cialis online safe

Anonymous said...

generic viagra online buy 4 viagra - should buy generic viagra

Anonymous said...

cialis medication cialis daily treatment - buy cheap cialis line

Anonymous said...

buy tramadol online amneal tramadol ingredients - tramadol for dogs purchase

Anonymous said...

buy cialis online is cialis generic yet - generic cialis rx

Anonymous said...

buy cialis buy cialis viagra levitra - caverta cheap cialis generic viagra

Anonymous said...

cialis online pharmacy where to order cialis online safe - generic cialis online usa

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 287   Newer› Newest»